2 November 2011

Workplace transformation, co-location, the public sector lease
moratorium and ‘low-hanging fruit’ were all keywords used by
Stephen Lovegrove - Chief Executive of the Shareholder Executive in
his opening address to the Public Property Summit, at the Business
Design Centre in London today in association with Capita
Symonds.
Lovegrove was standing in for Minister for the Cabinet Office
Francis Maude and his address echoed many of the strategies
outlined by the latter at his Public
Property Breakfast speech two weeks ago. Much in evidence again
was the government’s ‘Stop & Go’ property strategy of putting a
hold across all departments on the renewal of any property leases,
and freeing up surplus land for housing and redevelopment.
The day’s first keynote session: ‘Outlining Government’s
property strategy across the public sector’ featured Neil Warsop -
Chief Operating Officer, Government Property Unit (GPU), Jenny
Coombs - Project Director, Local Partnerships and Jonathan Goring -
Managing Director, Capita Symonds. Giles Barrie – Editor, Property
Week was Chair.
Warsop outlined how the Government’s ‘stop’ strategy had made a
quick and significant impact, delivering c. £90m in the first 10
months since the election and set to double that by the end of this
financial year. In terms of engaging with the private sector he
explained how the GPU’s strategy was to consolidate internally
first (to ‘get its own house in order first’ by tackling the ‘low
hanging fruits’) before looking to the private sector to help with
total workplace management and help it to ‘generate greater savings
that the public sector can achieve alone’.
Warsop also illustrated what the government was doing to promote
growth (the ‘Go’ part of its strategy) through the release of
surplus land by departments and also the opportunities for
stimulating regeneration through the potential relocation of
government departments.
‘Does this country know what it owns?’ was the question posed by
Jonathan Goring - focusing on the need for a better understanding –
across both public and private sectors – of both local and central
government property assets.
...the best local authorities had been working on the property rationalisation challenge for many years and that the ‘argument had been won’ a long time ago at local government level on the value of rationalisation...
Both sectors can only fully understand efficiency, he asserted,
when there is a clear picture of what assets are owned. Examples of
where this date would be invaluable included the better collection
of leaked revenues, rents and license fees across numerous
departments such as Defence, Environment and Justice.
Jenny Coombs outlined how the best local authorities had been
working on the property rationalisation challenge for many years
and that the ‘argument had been won’ a long time ago at local
government level on the value of rationalisation.
Coombs also pointed to a shift in approach by local authorities
to co-location and shared facilities (something that Councils have
perhaps been resistant to in the past). The scale of the deficit
and the need for savings had driven this, forcing them to work
together and redesign services.
...simple property asset management – drawing on the expertise of both the public and private sectors – can achieve so much in terms of its contribution to the government’s deficit reduction strategy...
It was clear that high performing local authorities are ‘well
ahead’ of central government in their rationalisation of properties
under their control – this, suggested Goring, was both because they
have been doing it for longer and also that they have more fully
embraced – so far – the ethos of workplace transformation and new
ways of working. Both Goring and Coombs encouraged the GPU to look
at the best practice already being achieved in some local
authorities and engage with its local government partners more in
achieving its own, much larger challenges.
In summing up the session Giles Barrie emphasised how simple
property asset management – drawing on the expertise of both the
public and private sectors – can achieve so much in terms of its
contribution to the government’s deficit reduction strategy,
without the need for major cuts or an impact on frontline
services.
This was a sentiment shared across the podium and with delegates
at the Summit, the challenge – summed up by Goring and by questions
from the floor at the end of the session – is how this process can
happen at a more rapid pace and how the private sector can fully
engage with government in this process.