1 February 2011
Richard Limb asks event organisers to remember the
sparkle...
Games of conkers banned in schools ... litter bins
removed for attracting wasps ... hundreds of trees cut down for
fear of falling branches ... pantomime stars banned from throwing
sweets into audiences ... cross country runs seen as too dangerous
... ‘outdoor’ pursuits for children banned ... pancake runs
squashed... and Santa Claus in a shopping centre made to wear a
body harness in his 5mph sleigh.
Many ‘Health & Safety’ stories in the
tabloids are apocryphal but there is no doubt that in recent years
we have seen the growth of a risk adverse society.
“How did we get here?”
Having worked in entertainment and leisure
safety for many years I can honestly say that some of the events I
attend nowadays are, quite frankly, boring. Events are supposed to
be exciting, stimulating and fun. The public now, more often than
not, wish to participate rather than watch, to push the boat out,
seek a buzz, an adrenalin rush …but a serious paranoia has gripped
event organizers, leading to many cancellations and/or curtailment
of activities.
Admittedly, this paranoia is sometimes
understandable as it’s a direct result of successful compensation
claims by the public fuelled by over zealous legal eagles and a
lack of risk management protocols. For example, the public have
been successful in even the most bizarre claims for compensation -
climbing over a perimeter fence and falling down a rabbit hole
being one of my particular favourites!
Nevertheless, this cotton wool culture is
seriously destroying the event industry’s spirit of adventure, fun,
enjoyment, fulfilment and excitement. It’s time to put things into
perspective and actually get to grips with certain issues.
We need a better understanding of the law and,
in particular, risk assessments. Health & safety legislation
requires employers to ensure that work places/activities are safe -
including events. Of course, risk assessment of the activities must
be carried out to deal with significant hazards and appropriate
control measures must be put in place. However, only reasonable
foreseeable significant hazards are to be considered and reasonably
practicable control measures put in place - based on potential
likelihood and severity. It’s basically commonsense and recognizes
you cannot guarantee, or indeed be expected to, an event is 101%
safe.
...David Cameron recently said: “We are going to end the unnecessary bureaucracy that drains creativity and innovation.” Lord Young advocated common sense, competence and compensation crack down and talks about rogue health and safety consultants and red tape...
Proper risk assessments by competent persons
can achieve good legal safety precautions for almost any activity.
An innovative, practical, pragmatic problem solving, creative
approach to hazard control can be very rewarding - resulting in
more exciting, stimulating, challenging events with new diverse,
unorthodox, ‘dangerous’ activities accommodated. Paranoid over
zealous, nit picking, paper producing processes do nothing of any
value. Properly thought out safety procedures that are put into
practice on the day need to be appropriate but not stifling. Risk
has to be managed, but it cannot always be removed - and nor should
it.
We need to put on a show, to entertain and
thrill crowds. The law as it stands is sensible and particularly in
relation to risk assessment allows a common sense practical
approach to managing health and safety in events - allowing us to
be more creative and innovative - let alone fully comply with the
law.
Perhaps things are finally changing. David
Cameron recently said: “We are going to end the unnecessary
bureaucracy that drains creativity and innovation.” Lord Young
advocated common sense, competence and compensation crack down and
talks about rogue health and safety consultants and red tape. This
is on top of Gordon Brown’s earlier risk assessment watchdog aiming
to halt the march of the nanny state.
The Institute of Occupational Safety and
Health also wants to clamp down on absurd application of the law,
stating that the standing of health and safety has been lowered by
ridiculous application and that it is sick and tired of
misinterpretation of health and safety laws that end in
cancellation of perfectly safe activities.
Eureka. At last?
Richard Limb
(Richard.limb@capita.co.uk)
is a Director at Capita Symonds.