Capita Symonds Website - health and safety common sense?
 
Skip Links
 

health and safety common sense?

1 February 2011

Richard Limb asks event organisers to remember the sparkle...

Games of conkers banned in schools ... litter bins removed for attracting wasps ... hundreds of trees cut down for fear of falling branches ... pantomime stars banned from throwing sweets into audiences ... cross country runs seen as too dangerous ... ‘outdoor’ pursuits for children banned ... pancake runs squashed... and Santa Claus in a shopping centre made to wear a body harness in his 5mph sleigh.

Many ‘Health & Safety’ stories in the tabloids are apocryphal but there is no doubt that in recent years we have seen the growth of a risk adverse society.

“How did we get here?”

Having worked in entertainment and leisure safety for many years I can honestly say that some of the events I attend nowadays are, quite frankly, boring. Events are supposed to be exciting, stimulating and fun. The public now, more often than not, wish to participate rather than watch, to push the boat out, seek a buzz, an adrenalin rush …but a serious paranoia has gripped event organizers, leading to many cancellations and/or curtailment of activities.

Admittedly, this paranoia is sometimes understandable as it’s a direct result of successful compensation claims by the public fuelled by over zealous legal eagles and a lack of risk management protocols. For example, the public have been successful in even the most bizarre claims for compensation - climbing over a perimeter fence and falling down a rabbit hole being one of my particular favourites!

Nevertheless, this cotton wool culture is seriously destroying the event industry’s spirit of adventure, fun, enjoyment, fulfilment and excitement. It’s time to put things into perspective and actually get to grips with certain issues.

We need a better understanding of the law and, in particular, risk assessments. Health & safety legislation requires employers to ensure that work places/activities are safe - including events. Of course, risk assessment of the activities must be carried out to deal with significant hazards and appropriate control measures must be put in place. However, only reasonable foreseeable significant hazards are to be considered and reasonably practicable control measures put in place - based on potential likelihood and severity. It’s basically commonsense and recognizes you cannot guarantee, or indeed be expected to, an event is 101% safe.

...David Cameron recently said: “We are going to end the unnecessary bureaucracy that drains creativity and innovation.” Lord Young advocated common sense, competence and compensation crack down and talks about rogue health and safety consultants and red tape...

Proper risk assessments by competent persons can achieve good legal safety precautions for almost any activity. An innovative, practical, pragmatic problem solving, creative approach to hazard control can be very rewarding - resulting in more exciting, stimulating, challenging events with new diverse, unorthodox, ‘dangerous’ activities accommodated. Paranoid over zealous, nit picking, paper producing processes do nothing of any value. Properly thought out safety procedures that are put into practice on the day need to be appropriate but not stifling. Risk has to be managed, but it cannot always be removed - and nor should it.

We need to put on a show, to entertain and thrill crowds. The law as it stands is sensible and particularly in relation to risk assessment  allows a common sense practical approach to managing health and safety in events - allowing us to be more creative and innovative - let alone fully comply with the law.

Perhaps things are finally changing. David Cameron recently said: “We are going to end the unnecessary bureaucracy that drains creativity and innovation.” Lord Young advocated common sense, competence and compensation crack down and talks about rogue health and safety consultants and red tape. This is on top of Gordon Brown’s earlier risk assessment watchdog aiming to halt the march of the nanny state.

The Institute of Occupational Safety and Health also wants to clamp down on absurd application of the law, stating that the standing of health and safety has been lowered by ridiculous application and that it is sick and tired of misinterpretation of health and safety laws that end in cancellation of perfectly safe activities.

Eureka. At last?

Richard Limb (Richard.limb@capita.co.uk) is a Director at Capita Symonds.

Bookmark and Share